Wilson v. Mason
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.
Appellants have failed to properly abstract the record in this case. There is no sufficient abstract of the complaint, the testimony nor the decree as required by Buie IN, so as to give this court an intelligent idea of the merits of the controversy. On this account the decree would have to be affirmed for this reason alone, but for the fact that appellee has supplied same. However, the case must be affirmed on its merits. The questions involved are principally ones of fact.
It appears that on November 3, 1931, appellants had executed and delivered to appellee a mortgage on the land in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gray v. MaloneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Bailey v. FrankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Deloney v. DillardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Freeo Valley Railroad v. HodgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Morris v. CobbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tyler, Administrator v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Balch v. Leader Federal BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993