Legal Opinion

Darnell v. Starks

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 6, 1966No. Civ. No. 66-133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KILKENNY, District Judge:

Defendant Starks seeks a remand to the state court on the ground there is no diversity of citizenship on the cause stated against him, as required by the Diversity Statute.1

Plaintiff was riding in a vehicle which left the highway as a result of a collision between vehicles driven by defendants Starks and Gilliam. Gilliam was operating a Government vehicle within the scope and course of his employment. Originally, the action was filed in the Clackamas County Circuit Court. It was removed to this Court on the petition of the United States. The issue…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Dorn v. HuffmanDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1963
  2. Lipinski v. BartkoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramiro Arango and Gabriella Arango, Individually, Etc., Plaintiffs v. Guzman Travel Advisors Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Jacobs v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1973
  3. Andelman v. GetzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API