Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Leasit USA Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1993No. 92-1032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION

2Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the trial court, insofar as it determined that the agreement of the parties was a lease and not a sales contract, because that determination is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We reverse that part of the judgment which determined that “Lopez presently has on his premises all of the equipment described in the leases.” There is competent and substantial evidence in the record that one ice machine was replaced at an additional cost of $20,000…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Trueba v. PawleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gomez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API