Lopez v. Leasit USA Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the trial court, insofar as it determined that the agreement of the parties was a lease and not a sales contract, because that determination is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We reverse that part of the judgment which determined that “Lopez presently has on his premises all of the equipment described in the leases.” There is competent and substantial evidence in the record that one ice machine was replaced at an additional cost of $20,000…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Trueba v. PawleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
4Cited by1 opinion
- Gomez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993