Legal Opinion

State v. M. W. H.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 2011No. 080643J; Petition Number 080643JA; A142382PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Youth was adjudicated in this juvenile delinquency proceeding for committing an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute possession of a concealed weapon (a small dagger) at school. See ORS 166.240. He appeals, assigning error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence, including the dagger, which was discovered after a school official “ask[ed]” him to empty his pockets. For the reasons that follow, under the operative standard of review, we sustain the juvenile court’s determination that youth’s response to the school official’s request was consensual. Accordingly, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. A. D.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. A. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. B. A. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MWHCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API