Legal Opinion

Crawford v. City of Meridian

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1936No. 32009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

On the former appeal in this case it was held that a peremptory instruction for the defendant was improper. Crawford v. City of Meridian, 154 So. 888. On the second trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. We are required, therefore, to examine the instructions granted at the request of defendant, and assigned as error.

Several of these- instructions charged the jury that the plaintiff must mate out her case by a clear preponderance of the evidence, whereas the law in such a case is that the burden on the plaintiff is that she shall prove her case by a preponderance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery Co. v. LewellingMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harper v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Millstead v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Choate v. PierceMississippi Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rein v. Benchmark Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Gulf Refining Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  3. A. Bertolla & Sons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Graves v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Gulf, M. N.R. Co. v. WeldyMississippi Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API