Crawford v. City of Meridian
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
On the former appeal in this case it was held that a peremptory instruction for the defendant was improper. Crawford v. City of Meridian, 154 So. 888. On the second trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant. We are required, therefore, to examine the instructions granted at the request of defendant, and assigned as error.
Several of these- instructions charged the jury that the plaintiff must mate out her case by a clear preponderance of the evidence, whereas the law in such a case is that the burden on the plaintiff is that she shall prove her case by a preponderance of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kroger Grocery Co. v. LewellingMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Harper v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- Millstead v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Choate v. PierceMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rein v. Benchmark Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Gulf Refining Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- A. Bertolla & Sons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Graves v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Gulf, M. N.R. Co. v. WeldyMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.