State v. Pierson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71. In his appeal the . defendant claims error (1) in the failure of the court to instruct the jury on the element of general intent to perform the physical acts that constitute the crime, and (2) in certain evidentiary rulings concerning the patient-psychiatrist privilege created by General Stat*213utes §§ 52-146d and 52-146e, claimed to have restricted both his cross-examination and direct examination of a psychiatric counselor-therapist who testified for the state. We…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.