Spegal v. Krag-Reynolds Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
An action in replevin to recover possession of personal property, consisting of goods, wares and merchandise. Appellant, who was defendant below, answered, in substance: That the plaintiff, a corporation, ought not to maintain its action because Marcellis J. Walker was on the 27th day of October, 1897, the owner and in possession Of the property described in the complaint, and on said date signed and pretended to acknowledge a chattel mortgage on the same to certain of his creditors (naming them), to secure them severally the payment of certain indebtedness then owing them by him, which…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Parker v. State ex rel. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Wilcox v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Weber v. MickIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- M'Instry v. TannerNew York Supreme Court · 1812
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SutherlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. TurnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Moore v. HarveyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Welch v. CollierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901