Leathers v. Kerce

1. Where in an action for land the evidence for the plaintiff required a verdict in her favor for the premises, and it was essential in . defense of the action to show seven years adverse possession of the land under color of title, and the defendant in her testimony admitted that she had not been in adverse possession of the land seven years before the institution of the suit, there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

2. Where after this direction the defendant asked for a new trial upon the ground that at the time of the trial, and at the time of the giving of her…