Legal Opinion

Runnals v. Aycock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Verdict. Practice in Superior Court. Exceptions pendente lite. Practice in Supreme Court. Continuance. Before Judge Boynton. Rockdale Superior Court. August Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Justice.

Runnals brought suit in a justice’s court against L. F. Aycock, who was the wife, and W. T. Aycock, the husband, upon two promissory notes given by them, bearing the same date, due at the same time, and for the same amount. To those suits there were two special pleas: one that the debt for which the notes were given was the husband’s debt, and that the wife signed only as security; the other, that this transaction was usurious, that the amount purported to be loaned on each occasion was $100, whereas only $85 was advanced. Those cases were not heard in the *555justice’s court, but…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schofield v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Alexander v. ChipsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Jones v. RaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. McIntire v. McQuadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API