Legal Opinion

Kurtzon v. Kurtzon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 21, 1950No. Gen. 44,306PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Iviley

This is an action to dissolve the Garcy Co. partnership and for appointment of a receiver to wind up the business. The Chancellor, pursuant to a Master’s recommendation, found that plaintiff had wrongfully dissolved the partnership; appointed a receiver on petition of defendants, C. Kenneth Kurtzon and Albert Cohen (called petitioners herein); ordered the business liquidated; and reserved jurisdiction to take an account of damages suffered by the petitioners. Plaintiff has appealed.

In March 1941 the several parties were stockholders in the Garden City Plating and Manufacturing Company.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sammis v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 68th St. Apts., Inc. v. LauricellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Pav-Saver Corp. v. Vasso Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Dodd v. CowgillNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Kurtzon v. KurtzonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API