Legal Opinion
Churchill Downs Distilling Co. v. Churchill Downs, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided February 11, 1936PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Richardson—.
/Affirming.
In 1933, B. J. Frentz and Ms associates, decided to engage in the whisky business. To do so, they organized under the law of this commonwealth, a corporation and named it Churchill Downs Distilling Company. No one interested in, or connected with, the corporation was of the name of 'Churchill or Downs. The corporation’s plant was located in Nelson county, Ky., about thirty miles from the place of business of Churchill Downs, Inc., Louisville, Ky. Thereat, it be-ban to purchase, bottle, label, and market whisky, and endeavored • especially to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Vogue Co. v. Thompson-Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Borden Ice Cream Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc. v. Winchester Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Selby v. MatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lawyers Title Ins. Co. v. Lawyers Title Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Grocers Baking Co. v. SiglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Ætna Auto Finance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- New York World's Fair 1939 Inc. v. World's Fair News, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1937
- Kay Jewelry Co. v. KapiloffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.