Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Shoemaker

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1948No. 4 Div. 58PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

This cause originated as a bill in equity whereby the appellant here, complainant in the equity proceedings, -sought specific performance of a contract entered into between the complainant and respondent. The bill alleged that in February, 1946, the respondent, who was engaged in the automobile business in Abbeville, Alabama, in consideration of the payment of $400 to him by complainant, as part payment of the purchase price of four new Ford automobiles, agreed to sell and deliver to complainant the 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th new Ford automobiles received by him after said date,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Brigham & Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Pollock & Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Culver v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Higgins v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Paris v. Buckner Feed Mill, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Wray v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. First Ala. Bank of Huntsville v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Taylor v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API