Unger v. Newlin Haines Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
The receiver of the Newlin Haines Company has presented his second and final account, and it having been audited by expert accountants, and there being no exceptions thereto, it is allowed and will be confirmed.
*17The only question for decision is as to who are entitled to fees, and how much. Mr. Waddington, who filed the bill, claims compensation out of the estate for services in representing the complainants, his clients, both before • and at sundry hearings after the appointment of the receiver during the prosecution of the cause. Mr. Godfrey claims an allowance out of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Albert Kernahan v. Franklin ArmsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Eufemio v. McKeownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Joe Hodges Transfer & Storage, Co. v. KeeffeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Bock v. Columbia Brewing Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- In Re New Jersey Refrigerating Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.