Wagoner v. Hiatt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
Respondent contends that the Division of Motor Vehicles was authorized under N.C.G.S. § 20-19(d) and (j) to revoke petitioner’s driver’s license for four years. We agree.
Petitioner correctly argues that the statute should be given its plain meaning, and the plain meaning of N.C.G.S. § 20-19(d), when read alone, does support her contention that the four-year revocation was unauthorized. N.C.G.S. § 2049(d) provides:
When a person’s license is revoked under subdivision (2) of G.S. 20-17 [which requires revocation for the conviction of an impaired driving offense] and the person has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. First Baptist Church of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. North Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Harrell v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Justice v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jordan Ex Rel. Winston v. Foust Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Lexington Telephone Co. v. Davidson Water, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996