Legal Opinion

Young v. Caspers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1977No. 46349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

Todd, Justice.

Dr. Carl G. Caspers performed an operation on Robert L. Young to relieve a back condition that was causing him some discomfort. While removing a surgical knife after making an incision, Dr. Caspers noticed that the tip of the knife was missing. The missing tip was not located and had to be removed by subsequent surgery. After the jury had returned a verdict for Young, the trial court ordered a new trial on the grounds that it had improperly submitted a res ipsa loquitur instruction. We reverse and reinstate the verdict.

In March 1971,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Hestbeck v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Kleinman v. Banner Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Willmar, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Holt v. BroeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stearns v. PlucinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Zeller v. American Safety Razor Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Stearns v. PlucinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API