Legal Opinion
Downs v. Allen
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions
At Law.
1Opinion of the Court
Shipman, J,
The first two named causes are actions at law upon judgments rendered by the chancery court for the Eighth district, 5 juthern chancery division, of the state of Alabama, in favor of Mary A. Downs; one being against the members of the firm of Hopkins, Allen 6 Co., and the other against John Allen, one of said firm. The third case is a hill in equity, by said Allen, to restrain the defendants from prosecuting said actions at law, upon the ground that said judgments *806were fraudulently obtained and are void. A trial by jury of said actions at law having been duly waived by written…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hall v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kistler v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Travelers' Protective Ass'n v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Rose v. Northwest Fire & Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1895
- Alaska Gold Recovery Co. v. Northern Mining & Trading Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1927