Legal Opinion

Tharp v. Shannon

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 26, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

95 N.J. Super. 298 (1967)

230 A.2d 902

MARGARET THARP, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET M. SHANNON, PLAINTIFF,

v.

FRANK M. SHANNON AND MARIO C. MALATESTA, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided May 26, 1967.

Mr. Charles E. Starkey for plaintiff (Messrs. Starkey & Turnbach, attorneys).

Mr. Robert E. Combs for defendant Frank M. Shannon (Messrs. Haines, Schuman & Butz, attorneys).

MUCCIFORI, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This litigation, presently before the court on defendant's motion for summary judgment, concerns the controversial problem of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Long v. LandySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Parks v. ParksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. HASTINGS BY HASTINGS v. HastingsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Reingold v. ReingoldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Palcsey v. TepperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Perry v. Borough of SwedesboroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. In Re Estate of WehrhaneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Glucksman v. STRELECKINew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Alfone v. SarnoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Alfone v. SarnoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API