Legal Opinion
Lundblade v. Doyle
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 17, 1974No. 73 C 47PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This is a pro se action seeking to redress the alleged deprivation of the plaintiff’s civil rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S. C. § 1983.
The jurisdiction of this Court is apparently predicated on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(3).
The plaintiff Thomas Robert Lundblade is presently incarcerated in the Illinois State Penitentiary at Joliet,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cashen v. SpannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RookOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Garrett v. BamfordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975