Legal Opinion

Kuehnle v. Malinoski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Both actions were brought for the foreclosure and sale of premises covered by the lien of the same mortgage. Action No. 1 was first instituted. The plaintiff Malinoski therein, and his wife, had executed the mortgage to one Buchaniee to secure the payment of $4,000 in 1929. In 1933 an assignee of the mortgage assigned it and its accompanying bond to the original mortgagee Buchaniee, and one Julia Kuehnle (the latter being the plaintiff in action No. 2), wherein it was agreed and stated that the interest of Buchaniee “in said mortgage amounts to the sum of $1,200, with interest on such sum,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McPherson v. . RollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. People Ex Rel Eagle v. KeyserNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Waterman v. . WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BaranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. BaranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. W. J. Mc Evily Plumbing & Heating Contractor, Inc. v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API