Legal Opinion
Chambers v. Glens Falls Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Macken, J.
At the conclusion of the evidence the parties stipulated that the issues be determined by the court and the jury was discharged.
The action is to reform a policy of fire insurance to conform to the agreement between plaintiff and defendant’s agent as to the coverage to be afforded and for judgment on the policy as reformed. The defendant denies that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought and affirmatively alleges as a defense that the action was not commenced within one year after the fire as required by the policy and section 168 of the Insurance Law. Plaintiff contends that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Ames v. . N.Y. Union Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Arthur v. . Homestead Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Steel v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
- L. Lewitt & Co. v. Jewelers' Safety Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gonsenhauser v. Home InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1967