Legal Opinion

Baynes v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1920No. 11245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Morgan superior court — Judge Park. December 20, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. The indictment is for assault with intent to murder, but embraces the minor offense of unlawfully shooting at another, as denounced by section 115 of the Penal Code (1910). The verdict is in part as follows: “ We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of unlawful shooting/' The remainder of the verdict fixes a punishment appropriate to the minor offense mentioned. The verdict is attacked as being void for uncertainty with reference to the offense referred to, and as being equivalent to an acquittal. Held:

[a) While the trial judge should not have received the verdict in the form in which it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  3. Ripley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Espy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Autrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API