Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Herr

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1933No. 14,542PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKime, P. J.

— This was an action by appellants in one paragraph to quiet title to realty. The appellee answered in general denial and also filed a cross-complaint, asking that her title be quieted. The trial court found for appellee on her cross-complaint and against the appellants on their complaint and rendered judgment accordingly. A motion for a new trial, setting out that the decision was contrary to law and that the decision was not sustained by sufficient evidence, was filed and overruled. The error assigned here is the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

It appears that in 1858 certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Christian Church of Sand Creek v. Church of Christ of Sand CreekIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Glader v. SchwingeIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Illinois Classis of the Reformed Church in the United States v. HolbenIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The Ind. Annual Conf. Corp. v. Lemon, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Price v. MerrymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. United Methodist Church v. St. Louis Crossing Independent Methodist ChurchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Presbytery of Indpls. v. First United Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Presbytery of Cimarron v. Westminster Presbyterian Church of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API