Thompson v. City of Palestine
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DUNAGAN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in behalf of the City of Palestine upholding the validity of an amendatory zoning ordinance. The appellants are neighborhood property owners who in the initial trial attacked City Ordinance No. 36-72. Ordinance No. 36-72 is an amendatory Si Ik zoning ordinance passed in -I960 and re-¿ zoned the area of property in ^question. ~ The trial court, sitting without a jury, denied all the relief that the plaintiffs had sought and gave judgment to the City, the appellee herein. Appellants duly perfected their appeal.
Appellants’ primary…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Seaman v. SeamanTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Bishop v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Cassel v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- City of Waxahachie v. WatkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. City of PalestineTexas Supreme Court · 1974