Reed v. Heath
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs Reed, Peterson, Luei, and Deyo appeal1 from a dismissal of their complaint due to inaction for over one year as authorized by SDCL § 15-11-11.2 We affirm.
On May 18, 1982, Plaintiffs served and filed a Summons and Complaint in an action alleging fraud. On June 7, 1982, John C. Farrar of the Gunderson, Farrar, Aid-rich, Warder and DeMersseman law firm of Rapid City filed an answer for Defendant Heath. On June 11, 1982, Farrar filed an *874answer for Defendants Stenberg and Schal-lenkamp.
According to the record, the next activity was a request by letter from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pearson v. AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Caneva v. Miners and Merchants BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by15 opinions
- Holmoe v. ReussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Baltodano v. North Central Health Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Jenco, Inc. v. United Fire GroupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Linard v. HersheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Swenson v. Sanborn County Farmers Union Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.