Legal Opinion
Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 5, 2014No. 11 Civ. 1266(SAS)(GWG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Following a series of letters from the parties (Docket ## 553, 579, 582, 657, 683, 690), the Court held a hearing on October 23, 2014 at which the parties discussed the production of documents withheld by defendant Bank of .China Limited (“BOC”) based on regulations governing “Suspicious Activity Reports,” commonly known as “SARs.” At this hearing, the Court rejected BOC’s assertion that the regulations barred production of the documents at issue. See Order, filed Oct. 24, 2014 (Docket # 693). We now provide additional…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Weil v. Long Island Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Union Bank of California, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- United States v. HolihanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Wiand v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Norton v. Us Bank AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Martin Nicholas John Trott v. Deutsche Bank, AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Yao-Yi v. Wilmington Trust CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020