Legal Opinion

Canales v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1948No. 24052Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The state, by and through its able district attorney, has filed a lengthy motion for rehearing in which it is contended that we committed an egregrious error in reversing and remanding this case on the ground that the jury, in their deliberation, commented on appellant’s failure to testify. Such a reference by the jury in their deliberation on the case is inhibited by Art. 710, C. C. P., as pointed out in the original opinion. See also Lout v. State, 122 Tex. Cr. R. 448 (56 S. W. (2d) 454; Reese v. State, 102 Tex. Cr. R. 511 (278) S. W. 451); and McCoy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Lout v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API