Hinds v. Marmolejo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Twentieth District Court of the County of Santa Clara. Belden, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
The sole point made by the appellants in this case is that, in this State, a national bank has no right to charge or receive a higher rate of interest upon money loaned than seven per cent per annum. Section 30 of the National Banking-Act provides:
“ Every association organized under this Act may take, receive, reserve and charge on any loans * * * interest at the rate allowed by the laws of the State or Territory where the bank is located, and no more; except that where, by the laws of any State, a different rate is limited for banks of issue organized under State laws, the rate so…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Johnson v. . National Bank of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gist v. Rackliffe-Gibson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- California National Bank v. GintyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Daggs v. Phœnix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1898
- Guild v. First National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- National Bank v. BruhnTexas Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.