Legal Opinion

Dinnocenzo v. Staniszewski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Substantial evidence supports the determination that petitioner was guilty of misconduct and insubordination based upon his unauthorized absences from work, failure to follow his supervisor’s direction to report his absences, and submis-

*841sion of time sheets falsely indicating the hours that he was present. Petitioner’s testimony explaining the reason for the absences and minimizing the length of those absences raised an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Coombs v Village…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coombs v. Village of CanaseragaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Hickman v. Poughkeepsie City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Tinney v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gaffney v. AddisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. GAFFNEY, BRIAN D. v. ADDISON, SHARONAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Gaffney v. AddisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Matter of Marentette v. City of CanandaiguaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API