In re Napolis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Motion for action upon charges brought by the Bar Association of the City of New York against the respondent of professional misconduct.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, P. J.:
These charges grew out of certain transactions of one Pecorini. Respondent was a friend of Pecorini, who was engaged in publishing an Italian newspaper in the city of New York and working among the Italians who were residents of the city. Pecorini had been accused of receiving money for Italians and appropriating it to his own use, when respondent, to shield Pecorini from such charges, wrote to Pecorini several letters, which evidently were intended for publication, one stating: “I have had two checks ready since July 15 th, and if you had only made up your mind some time ago…
2Cited by8 opinions
- In re BoschSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
- In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- Gregg v. GreggAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MershonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- State v. ThibodeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.