Legal Opinion

United States v. Osorio-Pena

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 26, 2001No. 00-1449PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

The district court denied the defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground that his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel did not meet the standard for “newly discovered evidence” under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. The defendant appeals that ruling. In the alternative, he asks us to decide his ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal, contending that the record is sufficiently developed for us to do so. We affirm the denial of the motion for a new trial and do not decide the defendant’s ineffective assistance claim.

I

In the early hours of August 1,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Efraim Natanel A/K/A Efriam NatanelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. D.G. Seago, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Henry James Wright, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. DesirCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  4. United States v. Mojica-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Smoak v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API