Legal Opinion
Weinstein v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2009No. 07-35751PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiff-Appellant Stephanie Weinstein was wrongfully arrested for trespassing when she refused a police officer’s direction to leave a residential property she co-owned as a tenant-in-common. Weinstein sued the arresting officer, Christopher Harrison, and the City of Eugene under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging wrongful seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment to Harrison and the City, and Weinstein appeals. As the facts and *701procedural history are familiar to the parties, we do not recite them here except as necessary to explain our…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Long v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Abel Aguirre MariscalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Beier v. Lewiston, City OfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Leigh Christina Miguel, United States of America v. Norman Jeremiah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. EspinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016