Legal Opinion

First Seneca Bank v. Gusty A.E. Sunseri

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1996No. 858 and 859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

In these consolidated cases, First Seneca Bank, d/b/a Integra Bank of Pittsburgh/North (the Bank) brings this appeal claiming that the trial court improperly awarded liquidated damages to both Gusty A.E. Sunseri and Pizza Roma Franchise, Inc., d/b/a Roma Italian Restaurant & Pizzeria of Hampton, Ltd. (Pizza Roma) (collectively, the defendants), pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 8104. The Bank relies upon Marston v. Tryon, 108 Pa. 270 (1884), in support of its claim that the demand for satisfaction of a judgment must be made upon the creditor, and not the creditor’s attorney. Because wé…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Key Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Louis John, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. First National Consumer Discount Co. v. FethermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In Re GreistSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Cty. Council of Erie v. Cty. ExecutiveCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Key Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Louis John, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Valley Forge Center Associates v. Rib-It/K.P., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. MowlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. ESB BANK v. McDadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API