Legal Opinion

Braswell v. Heartwell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1970No. 11406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

This suit was to partition a mineral lease. The % interest of H. J. Heart-well is subject to conflicting claims by his creditors. Prior to 1965 Heartwell was the operator of the lease. In 1965 Braswell took over the operation. In the course of the operation, Braswell advanced funds to pay for Heartwell’s pro rata *198share of the operating costs. In this action Braswell attempts to assert a privilege “for the preservation of the property,” superior to the claims of the other privileged creditors. Heartwell’s % interest was subject to three special mortgages and a judgment and a tax…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ernest Realty Co. v. Moore, Blane & Merklein, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Strange v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CourvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Primeaux v. LibersatLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Badie v. MarshallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Washington v. St. Charles Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API