Legal Opinion

Murphy v. International Freighting Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 4, 1960No. Civ. A. 57-533-FPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

Defendant A/S Sobral moves for summary judgment on the ground that this action, not having been timely brought, is barred by the statute of limitations or by the doctrine of laches.

This action is one to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff while working as a longshoreman on the vessel Bow Canada, owned by defendant Sobral. Plaintiff alleges negligence and failure to provide a seaworthy vessel. Plaintiff is a citizen of Maine and defendant is alleged to be a foreign corporation. The alleged accident occurred at Portland, Maine, on February 21, 1954.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. McAllister v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Loverich v. Warner Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Andrew Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. Kane v. Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leopard Marine & Trading, Ltd. v. Easy St. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. S.S. Lucie SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. Murphy v. A/S SOBRALDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. Thyssen Steel Corp. v. Federal Commerce & Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Granite Chemical Corp. v. Northeast Coal & Dock Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API