Legal Opinion

In re Whitman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

Aggrieved by what he believes was unjustified, arbitrary and illegal conduct on the part of the board of elections in rejecting his designating petitions, the suppliant herein invokes this court to compel the said board in pursuance of section 330 of the Election Law of this State to accept for filing said designating petitions so that he may stand as a candidate in the .primary election of the Democratic party of New York city for the office of Congressman in the Seventeenth Congressional district. Combating his plea the board asserts that the rejection was justified because the method of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of McKague v. PearsallNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. In re KollockNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Matter of Orange v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kerns v. WhitingNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Stephens v. HeffernanNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Veteran v. Tarrytown Citizens' Party for Village Offices of the Village of TarrytownNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Goldstein v. FentonNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  5. In re Village of WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API