Legal Opinion
EED Holdings v. Palmer Johnson Acquisition Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 19, 2005No. 04 Civ. 0505(RWS)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Andrew J. McKelvey (“McKelvey”) has moved under Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 9(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss certain of the claims against him in the amended complaint of plaintiff EED Holdings alleging that the corporate veil shielding defendant Palmer Johnson Acquisition Corp. (“PJAC”) should be pierced and that McKelvey committed fraud. For the reasons set forth be*510low, the motion is granted, and the allegations stricken.
Prior Proceedings
The initial filing of the complaint by EED and the previous motion by McKelvey to dismiss it are set forth in the October…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Acito v. IMCERA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Ninna, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- DirecTV Latin America, LLC v. PARK 610, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- United States ex rel. Raffington v. Bon Secours Health Sys., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Dolco Investments, Ltd. v. Moonriver Development, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Hart v. RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.