Legal Opinion

Keller v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 4, 1941:

Rosenberry, C. J.

Defendant’s brief contains no formal assignment of errors but states that the issues involved are:

“(1) Do the above-stated facts relative to the plaintiff’s title to the property constitute sole and unconditional ownership ?
“(2) At the time of the fire was the policy void and unenforceable against the defendant insurer by reason of the failure of the plaintiff to remove the vacancy and unoccupancy condition of the premises prior to the expiration of the time permitted by the policy for vacancy and unoccupancy?”

The facts are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Welch v. Fire Ass'n of PhiladelphiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Alkan v. New Hampshire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Day v. Hustisford Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Miller v. Yorkshire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. McKinney v. Providence Washington Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API