Legal Opinion
Kirkland v. Cablevision Systems
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 11, 2020No. 1:09-cv-10235Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GARRY KIRKLAND, Plaintiff, No. 09-CV-10235 (LAP) -against- MEMORANDUM & ORDER CABLEVISION SYSTEMS, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Before the Court are pro se Plaintiff Garry Kirkland’s three separate motions seeking a new trial.1 Defendant Cablevision Systems (“Cablevision”) opposes the motions.2 For the reasons below, Mr. Kirkland’s motions are DENIED. I. Background The Court assumes the parties’ familiarity with the facts of the case, and it will summarize only the facts relevant to the instant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Lore v. City of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- McLeod v. the Jewish Guild for the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.