Legal Opinion

Schmidt & Zeigler, Ltd. v. Carroll

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1935No. 14859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

Plaintiff, a wholesale grocery company, owner of a large automobile truck which was damaged in a collision With an automobile owned and driven by defendant, Leigh Carroll, alleging that the collision was caused by the negligence of the said Carroll, seeks recovery of the amount required to repair the said truck. Both Carroll and his automobile liability insurance carrier are made defendants. Defendant Carroll filed a reconventional demand which he later voluntarily dismissed.

In the court a qua there was judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.

The scene of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lopes v. SahuqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Bethancourt v. BayhiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Michel Bros. v. MallynnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. O'Kelley v. MocklinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
  2. Mangum v. ReidMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API