Legal Opinion

United States v. Virgil Redmond

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 24, 1978No. 75-1767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion of the defendant to designate a district judge to hear a petition to stay “imposition of sentence” is denied. This court has denied a motion to stay the mandate which was issued on January 5, 1978, and filed by the clerk of the district court on January 6, 1978. The district court has no power or authority to deviate from a mandate issued by the court of appeals. Briggs v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 334 U.S. 304, 306, 68 S.Ct. 1039, 92 L.Ed. 1403; see also Owensby v. Clark, 5 Cir., 451 F.2d 206, 208; United States v. Cato Brothers, Inc., 4 Cir., 273 F.2d 153, 157, and United States…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Cato Brothers, Inc., Wilfred R. Cato, William R. Cato, and Magie L. Dunn (Nee Magie L. Stone)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Townsend v. Richard B. Ogilvie, Sheriff of Cook County, and Jack Johnson, Warden of Cookcounty JailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  5. Jerry W. Owensby v. J. J. Clark, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WeikerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. WeikerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API