Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Lovington v. Hall

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1961No. 6758Published

1DissentCompton, Chief Justice

The majority says that the question is whether appellant’s business, required to be licensed by the ordinance, was actually regulated, and they rely upon our. own cases, City of Albuquerque v. Ranger Desdemona Oil Co., 26 N.M. 434, 194 P. 589 and Tharp v. City of Clovis, 34 N.M. 161, 279 P. 69, 71, to reverse the judgment.

The cases are readily distinguishable. In the former, the ordinance did not set out a single regulation and counsel agreed that the ordinance was a revenue measure. In such circumstance, what else was the court to do but invalidate the ordinance? The Tharp case, supra, while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Albuquerque v. Ranger Desdemona Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Tharp v. City of ClovisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API