Legal Opinion

Kreitner Bros. v. Lake Rose Realty Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Wayne County

Decided February 24, 1934No. 3Published

1Opinion of the Court

Swoyer, P. J.,

This matter is before the court on a rule to show cause why certain defendants named in a mechanic’s lien entered to the above stated number and term should not be stricken off as defendants therein.

The contention of the proponents of the rule, as stated by them, is as follows:

“Must a mechanic’s lien, filed under the Mechanics’ Lien Act of 1901 and its supplements, allege some contract between the owners or reputed owners against whom the lien is to be filed or against whose interest in certain premises a lien is to be filed, and the party claiming the lien?”

If this were the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Brien v. LoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API