Legal Opinion
Carnohan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 2008No. 07-55100PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Michael Casey Carnohan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) arising from the denial of permission to purchase a handgun. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815, 816 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (grant of summary judgment, dismissal for failure to state a claim); Lovell v. Chandler, 303 F.3d 1039, 1050 (9th Cir.2002) (Eleventh Amendment immunity), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted the United States’ motion for summary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lovell v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Delta Savings Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001