Campagna v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BIUNNO, District Judge.
This case was tried before the court without a jury on a number of days between criminal jury trials as calendar conditions permitted. 1
The findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P., appear in this opinion as allowed by that Rule.
The factual background in this case is not in serious dispute. The litigation ensues from disputes about some detail facts, about inferences and interpretations from the facts as found, and from the law applicable thereto.
Dominick Campagna had been in business as a general contractor for some years.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Marchitto v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Hirsch v. PhilySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Strong v. StrongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arkin v. Trans International Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Metro Shippers, Inc. v. Life Savers, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1980