Legal Opinion

Benbrook v. Trotter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 4, 1935No. 1494Published

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

R. E. Benbrook et al. sued E. C. Trotter for $602.90, balance due on a promissory note executed by the latter to the plaintiffs. Along with other defenses, the answer set up lack of consideration, payment, etc. The trial was before the court and jury. Upon the jury’s answer to special issues, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, but against him on his cross-action for damages alleged to have accrued to him by reason of wrongful attachment, etc. The plaintiffs appeal, and the parties will be referred to as in the trial court.

The plea of payment was based upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SprouleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Horsey v. C. E. Slayton & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API