Legal Opinion

Birnesser v. McGath

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1947No. Appeal, 32PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The only question here is whether the learned court below erred in entering judgment n. o. v. for defendant.

The facts are few and simple: At the time of this accident, May 1, 1942, plaintiff, Peter A. Birnesser, was an employee of the Pennsylvania Department of Highways ; his job was to work as directed upon state highways. The accident happened on the public highway, in Darlington Township, Beaver County, close to the Ohio state line. That morning, plaintiff and his foreman, in a small truck, went along the highway, for the purpose of painting or refreshing the divisor line.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. King Et Al., Appellants, v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Sajatovich v. Traction Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Robb v. Quaker City Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Petrie v. E. A. Myers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Roberts, Admr. v. Freihofer B. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bennett v. BoneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API