Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Daves

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

(after making the foregoing statement), •delivered the opinion of the court.

Under the rule applicable to a demurrer to the evidence, the jury might have found, and hence this court must hold, that the plaintiff was ready, able and willing to perform the contract on his part, and that the defendant was wholly in default.

The defendant was unable to perform his contract, and abandoned any effort to do so before the time fixed (January 20, 1921) for closing up the contract according to its terms, and so notified the plaintiff. Under these circumstances, no tender of a deed by the plaintiff to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Manss-Owens Co. v. H. S. Owens & SonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  2. Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Berry v. WorthamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  4. Young v. EllisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Harmon v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. High Knob, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  2. Reid v. BoyleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. McComb v. McCombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  4. Horn v. BowenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Coastland Corp. v. Third National Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API