Legal Opinion
Hurlbut v. Hurlbut
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Beatrice S. Burstein, J.
Plaintiff motivated this action to recover a money judgment for sums allegedly due and owing to her pursuant to a separation agreement. Among various defenses, defendant claimed the court lacked personal jurisdiction and a hearing was held to resolve this issue.
*572The parties were married in New York in 1957 and except for a brief two-year period spent in California, where the parties’ only child was born, both resided here until 1966. However, in 1965, they separated, following which plaintiff commenced an action in New York for separation. A motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Kochenthal v. KochenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. BERTRAND GOLDBERG ASSOC., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992