Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wilson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 20, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The executors of this decedent’s estate have instituted a discovery proceeding for the purpose of recovering two items of jewelry of substantial value. The respondents named in the discovery proceeding are the decedent’s sister Florence Palmataire, her sole surviving blood relative, and one Count Angelo M. Albani. Count Albani in his answer admitted possession of the jewelry but asked that the court determine whether the jewelry is the property of the decedent’s estate or the property of Florence Palmataire who claims that a valid gift causa mortis was made to her on or about…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. In Re the Accounting of Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Pattison v. PattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Stecher Lithographic Co. v. . InmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ward v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. Judith Felton v. Janet Felton Cooper, and Richmond J. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API