Legal Opinion

Schuette v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wilbarger 'County Court; J. A. Nabors, Judge. Action by W. D. Bishop against Henry Schuette. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.

The appellee, the plaintiff in the county court, was the tenant of appellant, cultivating the latter’s land under a contract for a one-half share in the crop, and alleged that, before the expiration of the tenancy, the appellant, the defendant in the trial court, in disregard of the contract, by force and threats, willfully and intentionally dispossessed and ejected him from the premises, and compelled him by such force and threats to abandon the same, and refused to permit him to re-enter, and that the defendant took possession and converted all the crops raised upon the place to his own…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Kansas Ry. Co. of Texas v. ShinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. ParkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Hines v. PopinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. ParkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API